Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Motivational Theories and Factors

To be effective, a company must learn to motivate its employees to efficiently meet the goals of the organization. Using what you know about motivation and the field of I/O psychology, respond to the following:
Propose at least three ways to motivate others in the workplace.
Create a strategy for enhancing your own motivation in the workplace.
Compare and contrast two motivational theories (found in Chapter 7 of your course text) of your choice.
Finally, discuss the pros and cons of using financial incentives in the workplace.
Your assignment must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA guidelines. Include a cover page and reference page formatted in APA style. In addition to the textbook, utilize at least one scholarly peer-reviewed source that was published within the past five years. Your sources must be cited according to APA format.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.
Description:

Total Possible Score: 12.00
PROPOSES THREE WAYS TO MOTIVATE OTHERS IN THE WORKPLACE
Total: 2.50
Distinguished – Exceptionally clear and well thought out proposals of ways to motivate others in the workplace.
Proficient -Clear and focused proposals of ways to motivate others in the workplace.
Basic – Somewhat clear and focused proposals of ways to motivate others in the workplace.
Below Expectations – Proposals lack clarity *or* fewer than three ways to motivate others in the workplace are provided.
Non-Performance – The proposal of three ways to motivate others in the workplace is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

CREATES AN EFFECTIVE STRATEGY FOR ENHANCING SELF MOTIVATION IN THE WORKPLACE
Total: 2.50
Distinguished – Exceptionally detailed and well-thought out creation of strategy for enhancing self motivation in the workplace.
Proficient – Effectively detailed creation of strategy for enhancing self motivation in the workplace.
Basic – Sufficiently detailed creation of strategy for enhancing self motivation in the workplace.
Below Expectations – Lacks detail in creation of strategy for enhancing self motivation in the workplace.
Non-Performance – The creation of an effective strategy for enhancing self motivation in the workplace is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

COMPARES AND CONTRASTS TWO MOTIVATIONAL THEORIES
Total: 3.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively compares and contrasts two motivation theories with high level of critical thought.
Proficient – Effectively compares and contrasts two motivational theories with reasonable level of critical thought.
Basic – Sufficiently compares and contrasts two motivational theories without critical thought.
Below Expectations – Lacks details in comparing and contrasting two motivational theories and is difficult to follow.
Non-Performance – The comparison of two motivational theories is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

DISCUSSES THE PROS AND CONS OF THE USE OF FINANCIAL INCENTIVES IN THE WORKPLACE
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Exceptionally clear and focused discussion of pros and cons of financial incentives in the workplace.
Proficient – Clear and focused discussion of pros and cons of financial incentives in the workplace.
Basic – Somewhat clear discussion of pros and cons of financial incentives in the workplace.
Below Expectations – Discussion lacks clarity and focus *or* only presents one side of financial incentives in the workplace.
Non-Performance – The discussion of the pros and cons of the use of financial incentives in the workplace is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

INTEGRATIVE LEARNING: REFLECTION AND SELF ASSESSMENT
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Assesses changes in own learning over time, recognizing varied contextual factors (e.g., works with ambiguity and risk, deals with frustration, considers ethical frameworks).
Proficient – Effectively communicates strengths and challenges (within specific performances or events) to increase effectiveness in different contexts (through increased self-awareness).
Basic – Depicts own performances with general descriptions of success and failure.
Below Expectations – Unsuccessfully defines own performances with general descriptors of success and failure.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

CRITICAL THINKING: EXPLANATION OF ISSUES
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding.
Proficient – Clearly explains in details the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.
Basic – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: CONTROL OF SYNTAX AND MECHANICS
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension or syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

APA FORMAT
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper, however, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. Layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

PAGE REQUIREMENT
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.
Proficient – The paper closely meets the page requirements predetermined in the assignment description.
Basic – The paper meets over half of the page requirement.
Below Expectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

REFERENCE REQUIREMENT
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Provides ample resources and uses the correct amount of sources from the specified search agent.
Proficient – Provides the approximate number of sources, while using some of the correct search agents specified in the assignment instructions.
Basic – Provides over half of the sources required in the assignment instructions.
Below Expectations – Barely provides adequate resources and unable to include sources from specified search agent.
Non-Performance -The assignment is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

"Is this qustion part of your assignmentt? We will write the assignment for you. click order now and get up to 40% Discount"