principles of corrections 2

A minimum of 1,300 words required for the total assignment and there must be three scholarly sources. The references does not count towards word count!

Part 1

Diversion and Probation

(Thinking Critically about Corrections: Probation Effectiveness)

1. Case Summary

In a narrative format, discuss the key facts and critical issues presented.

2. Case Analysis

How important to you, as a taxpayer, is recidivism as a measure of program success?

3. Case Analysis

Do you believe probation officers can really keep offenders from committing new crimes or violating the conditions of their probation?

4. Case Analysis

If you were a probation officer today, by which outcome measures would you want to be judged? Why?

5. Executive Decisions

There was a new diversion program developed in your county to help first-time misdemeanor drug offenders avoid incarceration and seek help in controlling their dependency. Your job as a diversion officer is to set conditions of diversion and then monitor and enforce compliance. One of your first clients fails the required weekly drug test. Should you immediately remove that person from the program? Why or why not?

Intermediate Sanctions

(Economic Realities and Corrections: Intermediate Sanctions)

6. Case Summary

In a narrative format, discuss the key facts and critical issues presented.

7. Case Analysis

What are the reasons why policy makers and voters are favoring intermediate sanctions for nonviolent, low-risk offenders?

8. Based on the average annual cost of boot camps (Exhibit 5-3) and the literature surrounding the effectiveness of boot camps, what would you predict about the future of boot camps?

9. Executive Decisions

You have been called to speak to a group of legislators regarding the importance of intermediate sanctions. Even though most of the intermediate sanctions show little, if any, impact on reducing criminal activity, explain to the group of legislators why they should not pull the plug on intermediate sanctions. Think about the other goals that intermediate sanctions achieve.

Part II

A minimum of 250 words and two scholarly sources are required for the main post. The references does not count towards word count!

In 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, in Estelle v. Gamble, that inmates do not have unqualified access to health care. Using at least two required sources, first discuss the key points of this ruling. Be sure to read the decision of the Court closely. Second, do you believe that current inmates and convicted felons just released from prison should be given the same level of healthcare as those who work for a living and pay the expense of healthcare coverage? Your answer must show why you feel the way you do.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


The post principles of corrections 2 appeared first on Top Premier Essays.

"Is this qustion part of your assignmentt? We will write the assignment for you. click order now and get up to 40% Discount"